I'm very conservative, especially with their foreign and military ideals. Just as an example, the British general elections were held not that long ago and the conservatives had a much better idea of what to do. They were the only ones who wanted to keep the trident missile defence and prevention system, meanwhile the liberals want to scrap all but one and keep that in its base (if you ask me, a nuclear deterrent doesn't really work when it's not in use). As well, the conservatives are the only ones who are taking the immigration problem from Europe seriously, cracking down on the ones who use the excuse of immigration to get free healthcare and welfare from our country.

Also, I don't agree with the idea that we lose our civil rights when security forces tap the phones of suspected criminals/terrorists and monitor the computer usage of same kind, it's for our own protection and it makes no sense why proper liberals are against it

(I'm prepared for the "treat the immigrants better" and the "but humans deserve the right to free speech and private Internet usage" comments  )

"in Dinant, the German army believed the inhabitants were as dangerous as the French soldiers themselves.[5][6] German troops, afraid of Belgian guerrilla fighters"
 
   I dont consider killing Guerilla fighters a war crime, if you fight like an army, then you should be treated like one, and again i agree bad stuff hapened there, but not any more than what the british and French soldiers did when they took Central Powers land

Can you show us where this happened with sources?

Sorry I had used image instead of URL. My mistake.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hague_Conventions_of_1899_and_1907#Hague_Convention_of_1899

Second off, while yes the **** of Belgium was used in propaganda it also actually happened:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rape_of_Belgium#War_crimes

Of course, the Germans would never starve civilians. By, say, cutting off supplies to an island nation. Twice.